Arsenal’s left back dilemma

While three of the four positions in Arsenal’s defence appear nailed down – Bacary Sagna is surely, as Arsene Wenger pointed out, the best right back in the league, with the excellent Laurent Koscielny and Thomas Vermaelen forming a solid partnership – there remain doubts over the Frenchman’s preferred choice at left full back. When one of Andre Santos and Kieran Gibbs have lined up there for the Gunners, it has mainly been by default due to the other being injured.

Many agree that in football the consistency in your line-up should come from your defence, as when a permanent three/four/five at the back (or 10 in Stoke’s case) are selected it’s easier for them to blend & gel, and give the team a unity to build upon. However, Santos and Gibbs offer Arsenal different things, and it’s a possibility that, with neither particularly edging the battle, Wenger may well select his left back based on the opposition, and which player suits the specific game more.

It may also be that, as @hazzaboy21 discussed on Twitter, Wenger will make his choice based on the player in front of the potential left back in the left wing position. If a player like Yossi Benayoun was selected, one who was more likely to cut inside, perhaps the more eager-to-overlap full back in Gibbs would be selected to keep the width. Only the other hand, Santos prefers to come inside and at times acts as an extra midfielder, so might perhaps tread on the toes of a roaming wide player like Benayoun. This player influence graphic of the game against Manchester City demonstrates Santos’ liking for dribbling in-field perfectly, as it shows him much closer to the midfielders than Gibbs was.

With Gibbs’ apparent inability to put together a string of games proven by his unavailability for the game against Wolves, doubts remain over his fitness and this may well be the factor that gives Andre Santos the position full-time. Technically, Santos is superb – the typical Brazilian “lateral” who likes to use the ball – and he often drifts inside to exchange passes, win the ball and help Arsenal keep the ball and win the midfield battle.

Santos is also similar to Koscielny and Vermaelen in that he likes to nick the ball away from attackers to start counter attacks – the move for Aaron Ramsey’s miss against City was started by Santos nipping in to win the ball. This enthusiasm may occasionally see him commit fouls, but more often than not it’s vital in helping Arsenal attack from the back as they love to do.

On the other hand, Gibbs is perhaps the complete opposite of Santos as a full back. He loves to overlap the winger, make runs down the left hand side and whip balls into the area. He’s always full of energy and attacking runs, and is also fairly handy at winning aerial battles. Here you would perhaps compare him to Bacary Sagna, who, like the Englishman, likes to overlap the winger, cross into the area and use his physical excellence to bomb up and down the wing.

Perhaps, then, Arsenal would be better off to pair Sagna with Santos to give them variety, rather than having two similar full backs who offer pretty much the same thing. Variety is a big part of Arsenal’s game – the very different Yossi Benayoun and Theo Walcott gave a vital variety on the wings against Manchester City, and they may well strive to achieve the same conglomeration.


Tags: ,

5 responses to “Arsenal’s left back dilemma”

  1. Scott (USA) says :

    Santos is our best left back. It’s really that simple. Not the best LB in the league but our best.

  2. Dave Highbury says :

    Two players every position that you rotate. This is the modern game. I don’t see it as a dilemma-more a luxury needed for cups next season. With the likes of Wilshire and Coquelin coming through, we almost have like for like in every position. Van Persie/ Podolski?

  3. Dave Highbury says :

    Luv watching Santos by the way.

    • David C says :

      Good article this :0)

      The key to our good run of form has certainly been the consistency in our back 4. When TV switched to left back in the Aston VIlla cup game, the attacking potential that we saw in the opening all but disappeared and there was only likely to be one winner. We have, yet again, been chronically unlucky in injuries to full backs and Coquelin has filled in well a la Flamini on our run to to the European Cup final.

      Personally, I don’t think either are strong enough defensively. But i like the idea of having both dependent on who plays in front of them. Gibbs is essentially a converted wide left midfielder and Santos is, in the mould of every good Brazilian full back, a full back in name only.

      I think Sagna has been every bit as good as anyone else and the consistency on both flanks has led to dispelling the belief that most pundits would lead you to believe is our weakness; the dependence on one goal scorer. Lack of width, by definitiion, means you’re playing through the middle. More width has seen more players getting forward to support and spreading the game.

  4. Muga from Tanzania says :

    Santos is better than gibs so as afc fan i would like our defence to be buildup by verminator, koscienly, sagna and santos but also i won’t like Ramsey 2 play instead of Rosicky b’se of his selfishnes like as he did on sunday’s game in tha last minute!and he is very slow compared 2 Rosicky!

Say something nice or amusing. Please refrain from making Manuel cry

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: